Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Memories, Search Engines, and Bar Cortona

This week, I decided to try something different, which brings me to the pleasant atmosphere of one of Sydney's best kept secrets, Bar Cortona in Homebush. We all have places of familiarity we visit when we meet friends i.e. a particular bar, a landmark, a movie theatre, or perhaps for those socially awkward types - a web forum. However, Cortona is a place that lends itself to circumstances which we're probably all finding more and more scarce - spending time alone without the ever lingering thought of work, entertaining company, outstanding tasks, seething rage about the constantly broken down ticket machines at Sydney train stations, and so forth.

Sitting on the neither small nor medium sized chairs, surrounded by the calming beige/orange pastels of the walls and the endearing, handmade jewellery and assorted home decorations - seashell photo frames, glass-blown cookie jars, a rooster carved from wood (I'm not sure who would buy that, but it works in here) - one can sit with a coffee, looking out the window on a Sydney winter which can typically include sun, rain and overcast within an hour, and think there is still a place to find a respite from living vicariously through Google and the Internet (where most of our social interactions are being recorded nowadays - or does this post now take that away as well?). The only gripe I have about this hallowed sanctuary is that the leisurely atmosphere seems to incite some form of juvenile Alzheimer’s among the new staff there.

The new guy at Cortona, a young scraggly looking kid (hair tossed about, face half-shaven, all in a prepared manner), always forgets my order. This is particularly irritating after the first 6 times, considering I've been going there for 4 years, and that my order is extremely simple (no soy-latte half sugar easy-on-the-froth with a spoon of cinnamon extra hot, or anything like that). Now these are not unrealistic expectations, when I say he forgets my order, I mean consistently only 5-10 mins after ordering he'll ask me, all uncertain tone, eyebrows tilted with an upward inflection at the end of the sentence 'What did you order again?'. Perhaps it's the puberty setting in, I know it's tough to think of anything other than girls at that age...maybe Neil Strauss can help.

After his most recent bout of memory lapse, I told him half-jokingly 'dude, you always forget my order', to which he replied 'I always get you confused with another guy that comes here, Pete...do you know Pete?’ The 'do you know Pete' bit was a weak lead to divert the conversation and perhaps provide him with some sort of excuse. I didn't know Pete, what's his last name? Pan, Sampras, Townshend, Wentz, Doherty? For all I know he could be the imaginary friend scraggly hair is giving my coffee to, while he forgets the real people sitting in the place. Imagination has a way of becoming hyperbolic when expectations aren't met, so I had this image in my head of a public announcement of scraggly hair announcing, Clinton-style 'I did not forget...that man's order'.

I'm not sure if there is a simple way to rectify this problem, and I doubt even Stephen Wolfram has the answer to that. I even asked the question to his brilliant new search website Wolfram Alpha. Although I couldn't find answers to complex human problems, before I knew it I was searching facts and figures of everything else, loving the idea of being able to 'compute' Michael Jordan's age to the day, and a moment later discovering the economic toll being wrought by Australia’s ageing population - as a percentage of GDP. With a single search entry, Wolfram produces a page of statistics, summaries and information as far as one is compelled to drill down into, needless to say it's a huge (and perhaps natural) step our conception of information search.

In his mesmerising novel The Shadow of the Wind Spanish author Carlos Ruiz Zafón describes the (fictional) 'Cemetery of Forgotten Books', a place containing all the books ever written, and the souls of their respective authors (seemingly a high-culture version of the Alice in Wonderland Library managed by Sir Cheshire Cat). It is not too inconceivable, with Wolfram Alpha, Google, Wikipedia, and perhaps Bing as repositories of all human knowledge attained over thousands of years, that 'real' books (as knowledge stores) will be confined to a lost cemetery, the top level perhaps becoming a popular place for university students to 'meet' - a combination of cemetery, shrine, nostalgia and the hormone-sharing taking place in today’s local libraries.

When we need an answer, we find search engines - whether this eventually helps us get an answer or leaves us more confused by choice is another question - which requires a search engine. Instantaneous access to so much knowledge - known as 'search overload' in industry parlance - will also have an interesting effect on our memories when we Gen-Y'ers reach older, riper ages (perhaps 100 will be the new 80 with increasing life expectancy). With so many answers available at the click of a button, what's the point of actually 'remembering' everything? Perhaps my answer to the scraggly kid dilemma is to post my order up on a website, with my name, throw in some metadata so it shows up early in search results, so he can type in 'what was his order - the guy that reminds me of Pete' and will come up with....my order! Sounds like a solution I will have to try out...but how am I going to remember it?

Now for some light entertainment, here's something I won't forget (for a week, at least).I'm sure you've all seen it, but you can't possibly get tired of seeing something superhuman like this. King James is 24 months, 5 days old today (thanks Wolfram).


Thursday, April 30, 2009

Tweep Tweep, Who got the keys to the jeep?

'Is Madonna an early adopter?' My tweets are lame (search harpt). However, even I don't tweet out stuff like this - "i iz tired" - thanks for that brit. I'm not sure of the reason you're following me, but I know why I'm not following you. In the last 2 months, I've found slowly but surely many friends and acquaintances are using Twitter as a primary source of information, from CNN feeds, NYTimes feeds to your more sublime and poetic fare such as "u remind me of my jeep...I want 2 ride it", or the prophetic "Ow this bleach hurts, rofl" - this could be interesting if it involved another person pouring the stuff on APGirlie3 - then it would also be interesting as to why she would be 'rofl' - too vindictive?. Google take note, if you want to buy Twitter, you're also buying into banal tweets (ban-weets), same goes for Facebook who, let's face it, may see their numbers dwindle by this time next year in the face of a(nother) significant tipping point in the history of social networking. Personally, I also like the word 'tweet' because it's like the commonly applied sounbyte used to censor swearing on brilliant broadcast TV like Jerry Springer and the like (I don't think HBO has this sound in their database - thankfully). In honouring this, for the remainder of this entry I feel it's only right...nay, necessary, to use the word 'tweet' place of profanity.

When you can break news of an American Airlines flight qualifying for Olympic Diving in the Hudson River, or a swine flu epidemic, or insider updates during the Mumbai Terrorist attacks (11/9 as its being cemented in the public consciousness) faster than the big boys of breaking news - you are onto something. When you figure out how to profit from feeding tweet inquiry into business enquiry - you are onto something. Likewise if a profitable model for news and reliable journalistic practice can be created from this technology (I am indebted to UNSW lecturer Kate Crawford for thinking in this direction). Invariably, in times of revolutions be they industrial, artistic, musical or technological (informational), the old system always breaks before a solution appears.

By the late 1800's, Horse Carriages, or more specifically the horses themselves, were producing such significant amounts of tweet that they placed an almost unbearable liability on the streets (infrastructure) and citizenry of New York City (amongst others), that a solution seemed nigh impossible till Henry Ford waltzed in with those wheels of his, and the internal combustion engine came of age (for those factussies - fact fussy people). Indeed, the tweeting horse tweet problem was such a threat that it dominated discussion at the first International Urban Planning Conference in 1898 - the issues were pollution, environmental by-products and infections where swelling human populations were in proximity with horses and their tweet, and the rise of carriage related accidents. Till Ford, citizens were left with more pedestrian solutions including development of NYC's professionalised street-sweeping service and developments of road rules to reduce carriage-related accidents and deaths (which happened more frequently than us of the 21st Century may expect). For a while there was a system in complete chaos, the dominant thinking being how to preserve the system rather than finding a completely new and innovative solution out of left field. We know the rest of the story, the horse-carriage arrived at it's not so glorious finish line, and a new race started with the Ford Model-A (1903). To begin a sentence with a classic line from 30 Rock's Dennis Duffy, 'In this analogy..', the horse tweet is the old way of doing things - newspapers, online newspapers, facebook (oops), and the internal combustion engine is what we're waiting for, Twitter is just the wheels - and someone's developing the idea for a new Ford Model-A.

Till then the metaphorical chaos in the virtual world gets reflected in the physical world. Illness, Flu. Swine? Is Medieval English on the comeback trail? Well the Urban Dictionary entry is particularly informative in this endeavour, and brings up such gems of definition as "Swine: probably one of the best words ever, swine can be used in any situation to degrade another person... ". The following are U.D's suggestions for potential uses around the watercooler and in everyday banter/duel with your arch nemesis from the middle-ages:

- Leave me alone you swine!
- Look at that tweeting swine.
- That man is a filthy swineish animal.
- You are the swine of all swine.

So it goes, and these may prove more effective in the event of the swine flu epidemic (or is it pandemic? - WHO's Margaret Chan is confusing us all). If it's pandemic, believe I’m taking a break from my beloved Vietnamese Pork rolls at Phuong’s Bakery. However, the possible severity of a pandemic should not be underestimated, particularly in light of the first swine-flu related death in Mexico. That there is any general sympathy about those most likely to be affected is questionable in light of...what else other than a tweet. Here's an incredibly touching, humanistic tweet from NYTimes columnist Charles M. Blow: "Pandemic, Smandemic, I want to invest in that surgical mask company". Lovely. We have the wheels, we need the engine, but what we really need is for these guys to stay in the passenger seats, preferably up the back with the naughty kids. Another browser window is chirping away with news, recommendations, and ban-weets about gardening and recessionary stock-tips. I would love to chuck my 140 characters of gold in with the rest of this horse tweet...but I iz tired.

Finally...a message from Jon Stewart.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Twitter Frenzy
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic CrisisFirst 100 Days

 
Custom Search